Privacy Compliance Automation with CyberSilo CSA (GDPR, PDPL, PIPEDA, CCPA, ISO 27701)

Compliance Standards Automation (CSA) gives privacy and security teams a living evidence map across GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, Saudi/UAE PDPL, PIPEDA, and ISO 27701 — inventory, rights clocks, assessments, vendors, retention, and Article 32-style monitoring via ThreatHawk.

Boundary: CSA does not issue privacy certifications and is not a law firm. It organises accountability artefacts supervisors, CBs, and enterprise customers ask for.

What CSA Tracks for Privacy

Area

Examples

Inventory

Systems, purposes, recipients, locations

Rights

DSAR / consumer request cases and multi-law clocks

Assessments

PIA / DPIA workflows and residual-risk actions

Vendors

Processor register, DPA status, sub-processors

Retention

Schedule rows linked to purge evidence

Security

TOM status + ThreatHawk monitoring artefacts

Incidents

Breach timelines mapped to applicable laws

ISO 27701

SoA-linked evidence for PIMS audits

What ThreatHawk Adds

Continuous logging for confidentiality/integrity evidence
Faster awareness for breach clocks (e.g. GDPR Art 33)
Access trails that support DSAR investigations

Framework Packs

Reuse the same objects across CSA GDPR, CCPA programmes, PDPL readiness, PIPEDA, and ISO 27701 — avoiding divergent spreadsheets per law.

Automate Privacy Evidence Across Laws

One control plane for inventory, rights, and security proof.

Talk to CyberSilo CSA Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

Does CSA certify privacy compliance?

No. Authorities, customers, and certification bodies decide. CSA organises evidence.

Can CSA replace a DPO?

No. Where law requires a DPO, you still need a qualified person or properly structured service.

Is ThreatHawk required?

Privacy laws expect appropriate security. ThreatHawk is CyberSilo’s SIEM path; equivalent telemetry can be linked.

CSA GDPR · ISO 27701 · Privacy software · ThreatHawk