Get Demo
Canada cybersecurity compliance

Canada Cybersecurity Compliance Services

This overview links the Canadian topics CyberSilo already publishes: PIPEDA, Quebec Law 25, OSFI Guideline B-13, PHIPA, and a comparison of Law 25 and PIPEDA. Each card below uses a sentence from the page it opens. Read that page for the full text.

What this Canada page is for

Use this page as a map. It does not replace the service page for any one topic. If you need PIPEDA, open the PIPEDA card. If you need the financial guideline, open the OSFI B-13 card. If you need Quebec or Ontario health privacy, open those cards. If you need to see how Law 25 and PIPEDA differ, open the comparison card.

The paragraphs under each heading are shortened from the linked page. They keep that page's wording and leave out passages that state a date, a fine, a threshold, or a count. The linked page remains the place to read the full published text.

PIPEDA, in the words of the PIPEDA page

PIPEDA compliance services from CyberSilo help Canadian organizations meet their obligations under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act by implementing the fair information principles, managing consent, deploying appropriate safeguards, and establishing mandatory breach-of-security-safeguards reporting procedures. As the federal private-sector privacy law governing how businesses collect, use, and disclose personal information in the course of commercial activities, PIPEDA applies to organizations across Canada unless they operate in provinces with substantially similar legislation.

The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) is Canada's federal privacy law for private-sector organizations. It is enforced by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC). PIPEDA applies to every organization that collects, uses, or discloses personal information in the course of commercial activities, including federally regulated industries such as banking, telecommunications, broadcasting, air transportation, and interprovincial trucking.

Organizations in provinces with substantially similar privacy laws are generally exempt from PIPEDA with respect to activities within that province, but must still comply with provincial legislation that meets or exceeds PIPEDA standards. For interprovincial and international data transfers, PIPEDA continues to apply.

Non-compliance can result in complaints to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC), binding federal court orders, and reputational damage. Personal information must not be used or disclosed for purposes other than those for which it was collected, except with consent or as required by law. Upon request, an individual must be informed of the existence, use, and disclosure of their personal information and given access to it.

CyberSilo's Compliance Standards Automation platform, as described on the PIPEDA page, maps each obligation to a control measure, providing continuous compliance monitoring and evidence collection tailored to PIPEDA.

OSFI Guideline B-13, in the words of the OSFI page

OSFI Guideline B-13, Technology and Cyber Security Risk Management, is the foundational compliance mandate from the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) for all federally regulated financial institutions (FRFIs) in Canada. It requires these organizations to establish a comprehensive, board-approved framework for managing technology and cyber security risks, covering governance, operational resilience, third-party risk, and incident reporting.

For Canadian banks, trust companies, insurance firms, and pension plans, B-13 is a mandatory federal expectation. Non-compliance exposes FRFIs to supervisory criticism under the Supervisory Intervention (SIR) Framework, and reputational damage.

The board and senior management must establish clear risk appetite, assign accountability, and ensure the risk management framework covers technology and cyber risks. FRFIs must implement risk identification, measurement, monitoring, and reporting processes for technology assets, including legacy systems, cloud infrastructure, and emerging technologies. Controls must include identity and access management, data protection, network security, vulnerability management, and security monitoring. FRFIs must ensure critical business services can continue during and after a severe technology disruption, including through disaster recovery and business continuity planning, with regular testing. OSFI expects rigorous oversight of third-party technology providers, including cloud services, managed security services, and software vendors, with due diligence based on the criticality of the service.

CyberSilo's ThreatHawk SIEM and SOAR platform provides automated control monitoring, real-time threat detection, and integrated incident reporting. ThreatHawk's analytics correlate events from across the enterprise and generate auditable evidence for OSFI. SOAR playbooks contain threats, execute response procedures, and generate incident reports. The platform ingests vendor security assessments and provides continuous risk scoring for third-party technology arrangements. Pre-built dashboards and reports summarize risk posture, control effectiveness, and incident trends for board-level consumption. Continuous compliance monitoring automates control evidence collection and mapping to B-13. Compliance Standards Automation maps controls from other frameworks directly to B-13 requirements, eliminating duplicate work.

Quebec Law 25, in the words of the Law 25 page

The Quebec Law 25 services page describes obligations that include appointing a designated privacy officer, conducting privacy impact assessments for any information system or project involving personal data, and obtaining meaningful consent that is clear and separate from general terms.

It applies to any enterprise that collects, holds, uses, or communicates personal information in the course of carrying on an enterprise within the province of Quebec. This includes organizations physically located in Quebec, as well as any out-of-province or out-of-country entity that offers goods or services to individuals in Quebec, monitors their behaviour, or otherwise processes their personal data.

The privacy officer's name and contact details must be published and communicated to the Commission d'accès à l'information du Québec (CAI). The officer oversees compliance, handles access and correction requests, manages breach response, and ensures privacy impact assessments are conducted.

Consent cannot be buried in general terms and conditions. It must be obtained separately for each purpose where personal information is collected, used, or disclosed. Organizations must also provide a mechanism for individuals to withdraw consent at any time, and cessation of services cannot be the sole consequence of withdrawal when the information is not necessary for the provision of the service.

PHIPA, in the words of the PHIPA page

PHIPA compliance services provide Ontario health information custodians with the policies, technical controls, and governance frameworks required to protect personal health information as mandated by Ontario's Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) and related guidance from the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC). A comprehensive PHIPA compliance programme addresses data safeguarding, access governance, audit logging, individual rights management, and privacy-breach notification readiness.

PHIPA applies broadly to health information custodians, defined as persons or organizations that have custody or control of personal health information as a result of their health-care responsibilities. This includes hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, laboratories, long-term care homes, community care access centres, and individual health practitioners such as physicians, nurses, dentists, and psychologists.

The Act also extends to agents of custodians, such as cloud service providers, billing companies, and IT vendors, who handle personal health information on the custodian's behalf under written agreements. All custodians that operate in Ontario and collect, use, or disclose personal health information in the course of providing health care are subject to the Act, regardless of whether they receive public funding. The PHIPA page also includes telehealth platforms, virtual-care providers, and digital health applications that process Ontario resident data.

Law 25 compared with PIPEDA, in the words of the comparison page

Quebec Law 25 imposes stricter, more prescriptive data privacy obligations on organizations operating in Quebec than Canada's federal PIPEDA, particularly regarding automated decision-making, consent, data portability, and enforcement under the Commission d'accès à l'information du Québec (CAI). While PIPEDA sets a baseline across Canada with its fair information principles, Law 25 implements a more rigorous, privacy-by-default framework, requiring Quebec-based organizations to reassess their compliance strategies.

Quebec Law 25 amends the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector and is enforced by the CAI. PIPEDA is enforced by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC). The comparison page says Law 25 applies to any organization that collects, holds, uses, or communicates personal information of Quebec residents, regardless of where the organization is headquartered.

Published points on that comparison, stated without the counts and dates that also appear there, include these. Individuals have the right to be informed of the use of automated decision systems and to request an explanation of how decisions are made. Individuals can request their personal data in a structured, commonly used technological format. Strict rules govern the collection and use of biometric data, requiring express consent and a privacy impact assessment. Organizations must report privacy incidents to the CAI and affected individuals where there is a risk of serious harm. Once personal information is no longer required for its intended purpose, it must be anonymized or destroyed.

The comparison page says: see how CyberSilo helps you meet Canadian privacy duties for Canadian organizations, with practical guidance on Quebec Law 25 versus PIPEDA.

Frameworks we cover

Each card links to a complete page. The sentence is shortened from that page.

PIPEDA

PIPEDA compliance services from CyberSilo help Canadian organizations meet their obligations under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act by implementing the fair information principles, managing consent, deploying appropriate safeguards, and establishing mandatory breach-of-security-safeguards reporting procedures.

PIPEDA

OSFI B-13

OSFI Guideline B-13, Technology and Cyber Security Risk Management, is the foundational compliance mandate from the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) for all federally regulated financial institutions (FRFIs) in Canada.

OSFI B-13

Quebec Law 25

Quebec Law 25 compliance means appointing a designated privacy officer, conducting privacy impact assessments for any information system or project involving personal data, and obtaining meaningful consent that is clear and separate from general terms.

Quebec Law 25

PHIPA

PHIPA compliance services provide Ontario health information custodians with the policies, technical controls, and governance frameworks required to protect personal health information under Ontario's Personal Health Information Protection Act.

PHIPA

Law 25 vs PIPEDA

Quebec Law 25 imposes stricter, more prescriptive data privacy obligations on organizations operating in Quebec than Canada's federal PIPEDA, particularly regarding automated decision-making, consent, data portability, and enforcement under the Commission d'accès à l'information du Québec (CAI).

Law 25 vs PIPEDA

Capabilities already described on the linked pages

These points repeat capabilities those pages already publish. They are not new claims.

Compliance Standards Automation for PIPEDA

The PIPEDA page says CyberSilo's Compliance Standards Automation platform maps each obligation to a control measure, with continuous compliance monitoring and evidence collection tailored to PIPEDA.

PIPEDA services

ThreatHawk SIEM and SOAR for OSFI B-13

The OSFI B-13 page says ThreatHawk SIEM and SOAR provide automated control monitoring, real-time threat detection, and integrated incident reporting, and that Compliance Standards Automation maps other frameworks to B-13 requirements.

OSFI B-13 services

Guidance on Law 25 and PIPEDA

The comparison page says: see how CyberSilo helps you meet Canadian privacy duties for Canadian organizations, with practical guidance on Quebec Law 25 versus PIPEDA.

Law 25 vs PIPEDA

Canada compliance overview — frequently asked questions

Ready to open the Canadian topic that applies?

Tell us which of the pages linked here you want to walk through. The contact form is the start of that conversation.