Get Demo
↑

NIST Incident Response Plan Template (800-61 Rev 3 / CSF Aligned)

IR plan sections mapped to CSF Detect, Respond, and Recover and SP 800-61 Rev 3 Community Profile guidance.

Published: September 2026 Compliance · NIST 8-12 min read

SP 800-61 Revision 3 frames incident response as a CSF 2.0 Community Profile, not only the classic Preparation through Recovery binder. Your IR plan should still be operational — roles, severity, playbooks, evidence — while mapping outcomes to Detect, Respond, and Recover.

Related: 800-61 Rev 3 guide · Respond function · Detect.

IR Plan Template — Table of Contents

  1. Purpose, scope, and severity definitions
  2. Roles, on-call, and escalation (including executives and legal)
  3. Preparation and enabling controls (Govern / Identify / Protect linkages)
  4. Detection and analysis procedures (Detect)
  5. Containment, eradication, recovery (Respond / Recover)
  6. Communications and regulatory notifications
  7. Evidence handling and forensics
  8. Lessons learned and improvement (ID.IM)
  9. Tabletop and exercise schedule

How CyberSilo Helps

Operationalize Detect, Respond, and Recover

Connect playbooks to SIEM timelines and CSF Subcategories auditors can follow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can we still use the four-phase IR lifecycle?

Yes, as an internal model. Map phases to CSF Functions so the plan stays compatible with SP 800-61 Rev 3 and CSF Profiles.

How often should we tabletop?

At least annually is common practice; increase cadence after major changes, incidents, or customer/contract requirements.

Does this replace 800-53 IR controls?

No. The plan is an operational artefact that helps demonstrate IR-family outcomes when those controls are selected.

NIST hub · What Is NIST CSF 2.0? · 800-171 Rev 3 Changes · 800-61 Guide

📰 More from CyberSilo

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of evolving cyber threats with our expert insights

Fintech Compliance Automation: Multi-Jurisdiction Requirements (PCI, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, SAMA)
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 17 min

Fintech Compliance Automation: Multi-Jurisdiction Requirements (PCI, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, SAMA)

Harmonize fintech compliance across PCI DSS, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, and SAMA CSF with unified controls and Compliance Standards Automation.

Read Article
How MSSPs Help Clients Achieve PCI DSS Compliance at Scale
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

How MSSPs Help Clients Achieve PCI DSS Compliance at Scale

Learn how MSSPs deliver PCI DSS Requirement 10 and audit-ready evidence at scale with ThreatHawk MSSP SIEM and Compliance Standards Automation.

Read Article
The 5 Biggest Operational Mistakes MSSPs Make When Managing Multiple Client SOCs
Partners
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

The 5 Biggest Operational Mistakes MSSPs Make When Managing Multiple Client SOCs

Avoid the top MSSP multi-tenant SOC mistakes—customization sprawl, weak isolation, alert floods, shallow QBRs, and sloppy onboarding—with ThreatHawk MSSP SIEM and Agentic SOC AI.

Read Article
What Is ISO 27001? A Practical 2026 Guide for Security and GRC Teams
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 16 min

What Is ISO 27001? A Practical 2026 Guide for Security and GRC Teams

ISO/IEC 27001 explained for 2026: ISMS scope, Annex A controls, certification stages, and how continuous monitoring supports audit-ready evidence.

Read Article
What Is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? CSF 2.0 Explained for 2026
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

What Is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? CSF 2.0 Explained for 2026

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 explained: six Functions, Profiles, Tiers, and how to operationalize outcomes with SIEM and GRC in 2026.

Read Article
How NIST Helps Cybersecurity Programs Mature in 2026
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 14 min

How NIST Helps Cybersecurity Programs Mature in 2026

How NIST publications improve cybersecurity: CSF 2.0, SP 800-53, incident guidance, and practical ways to turn NIST outcomes into SOC metrics and audit evidence.

Read Article
✅ Link copied!