Get Demo
↑

ISO 27001 Risk Assessment: Methodology, Template and Examples

Practical ISO 27001:2022 risk assessment methods, a sample risk register template, and examples teams can adapt under Clause 6.1.2.

Published: September 2026 Compliance · ISO 27001 8–12 min read

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requires an information security risk assessment process (6.1.2) and risk treatment that produces a Statement of Applicability (6.1.3). This page gives a practical methodology outline and an example register — not a substitute for reading the standard.

Related: SoA template guide · ISMS scope · Gap analysis.

Method freedom, process discipline: Auditors care that criteria, owners, results, and treatment decisions are consistent and retained as documented information — not that you copied a vendor matrix.

Common Method Choices

Sample Risk Register Columns

Field
Purpose
Risk ID
Stable identifier for treatment tracking
Asset / process
What is at stake inside the ISMS scope
Threat / scenario
What could go wrong
Likelihood / impact
Per your 6.1.2 criteria
Risk level
Before and after treatment
Treatment option
Mitigate, avoid, share, accept
Controls (SoA link)
Annex A and/or designed controls
Owner / due date
Accountability

Example Rows (Illustrative)

Build Your ISO 27001 Programme with Continuous Evidence

CyberSilo CSA maps ISMS artefacts and Annex A control evidence; ThreatHawk supports logging and monitoring proof for technological controls.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does ISO 27001 prescribe one risk method?

No. Clause 6.1.2 requires a defined process with criteria for accepting risks and identifying acceptable risk levels. Asset-based, scenario-based, or hybrid methods are all used in practice.

How often must risk assessment run?

At planned intervals and when significant changes are proposed or occur (Clause 8.2), using the criteria established in 6.1.2.

Is the Statement of Applicability part of risk treatment?

Yes. Producing the SoA is part of Clause 6.1.3 risk treatment.

SoA guide · Gap analysis · Mandatory documents · ISO 27001 hub

📰 More from CyberSilo

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of evolving cyber threats with our expert insights

Fintech Compliance Automation: Multi-Jurisdiction Requirements (PCI, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, SAMA)
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 17 min

Fintech Compliance Automation: Multi-Jurisdiction Requirements (PCI, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, SAMA)

Harmonize fintech compliance across PCI DSS, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, and SAMA CSF with unified controls and Compliance Standards Automation.

Read Article
How MSSPs Help Clients Achieve PCI DSS Compliance at Scale
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

How MSSPs Help Clients Achieve PCI DSS Compliance at Scale

Learn how MSSPs deliver PCI DSS Requirement 10 and audit-ready evidence at scale with ThreatHawk MSSP SIEM and Compliance Standards Automation.

Read Article
The 5 Biggest Operational Mistakes MSSPs Make When Managing Multiple Client SOCs
Partners
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

The 5 Biggest Operational Mistakes MSSPs Make When Managing Multiple Client SOCs

Avoid the top MSSP multi-tenant SOC mistakes—customization sprawl, weak isolation, alert floods, shallow QBRs, and sloppy onboarding—with ThreatHawk MSSP SIEM and Agentic SOC AI.

Read Article
What Is ISO 27001? A Practical 2026 Guide for Security and GRC Teams
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 16 min

What Is ISO 27001? A Practical 2026 Guide for Security and GRC Teams

ISO/IEC 27001 explained for 2026: ISMS scope, Annex A controls, certification stages, and how continuous monitoring supports audit-ready evidence.

Read Article
What Is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? CSF 2.0 Explained for 2026
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

What Is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? CSF 2.0 Explained for 2026

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 explained: six Functions, Profiles, Tiers, and how to operationalize outcomes with SIEM and GRC in 2026.

Read Article
How NIST Helps Cybersecurity Programs Mature in 2026
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 14 min

How NIST Helps Cybersecurity Programs Mature in 2026

How NIST publications improve cybersecurity: CSF 2.0, SP 800-53, incident guidance, and practical ways to turn NIST outcomes into SOC metrics and audit evidence.

Read Article
✅ Link copied!