Get Demo
↑

DORA Register of Information: Template and How to Complete It

How to structure and maintain the DORA register of information for ICT third-party arrangements — fields, ownership.

Published: September 2026 Compliance · DORA 8–12 min read

The register of information is the living inventory of ICT third-party arrangements that financial entities must maintain and be ready to submit. It is one of the most searched — and most under-owned — DORA artefacts.

Related: DORA hub · Article 30 / third-party risk · CSA.

Design rule: Treat the register as a controlled dataset with clear ownership (procurement + ICT risk + legal), not a one-off spreadsheet export. Align fields to the applicable ITS/reporting templates your competent authority / ESA channel expects — avoid treating a vendor blog schema as an official substitute.

Why Supervisors Care

The register underpins concentration-risk analysis, subcontracting visibility, and Critical ICT Third-Party Provider oversight. Incomplete or stale registers are a common examination finding.

Field Themes to Capture

Operating Cadence

How CyberSilo Helps

Make the Register Supervisable

CSA can host register records alongside third-party assessments and contract artefacts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the register only for cloud providers?

No. It covers ICT third-party service arrangements broadly — including non-cloud ICT services that support critical or important functions.

Who owns the register day to day?

Typically joint ownership: ICT risk / CISO for criticality, procurement for commercial data, legal for contract facts, with a single accountable executive.

Can we keep it in a spreadsheet forever?

Spreadsheets fail under version control and multi-entity reporting. Move to a controlled system with audit trail before the next supervisory request.

Hub · For ICT providers · Checklist

📰 More from CyberSilo

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of evolving cyber threats with our expert insights

Fintech Compliance Automation: Multi-Jurisdiction Requirements (PCI, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, SAMA)
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 17 min

Fintech Compliance Automation: Multi-Jurisdiction Requirements (PCI, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, SAMA)

Harmonize fintech compliance across PCI DSS, SOC 2, GDPR, MAS, and SAMA CSF with unified controls and Compliance Standards Automation.

Read Article
How MSSPs Help Clients Achieve PCI DSS Compliance at Scale
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

How MSSPs Help Clients Achieve PCI DSS Compliance at Scale

Learn how MSSPs deliver PCI DSS Requirement 10 and audit-ready evidence at scale with ThreatHawk MSSP SIEM and Compliance Standards Automation.

Read Article
The 5 Biggest Operational Mistakes MSSPs Make When Managing Multiple Client SOCs
Partners
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

The 5 Biggest Operational Mistakes MSSPs Make When Managing Multiple Client SOCs

Avoid the top MSSP multi-tenant SOC mistakes—customization sprawl, weak isolation, alert floods, shallow QBRs, and sloppy onboarding—with ThreatHawk MSSP SIEM and Agentic SOC AI.

Read Article
What Is ISO 27001? A Practical 2026 Guide for Security and GRC Teams
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 16 min

What Is ISO 27001? A Practical 2026 Guide for Security and GRC Teams

ISO/IEC 27001 explained for 2026: ISMS scope, Annex A controls, certification stages, and how continuous monitoring supports audit-ready evidence.

Read Article
What Is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? CSF 2.0 Explained for 2026
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 15 min

What Is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? CSF 2.0 Explained for 2026

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 explained: six Functions, Profiles, Tiers, and how to operationalize outcomes with SIEM and GRC in 2026.

Read Article
How NIST Helps Cybersecurity Programs Mature in 2026
Compliance
Oct 11, 2026 ⏱ 14 min

How NIST Helps Cybersecurity Programs Mature in 2026

How NIST publications improve cybersecurity: CSF 2.0, SP 800-53, incident guidance, and practical ways to turn NIST outcomes into SOC metrics and audit evidence.

Read Article
✅ Link copied!